|
|
| |
<<first
page
Having
two rival technologies sometimes results in more choice for the
end buyer. In this case, though, it merely fractured the record
and audio hardware industries, since the two disc formats are
entirely incompatible. Until recently, an SACD player only played
SACDs (and regular CDs), while a DVD-Audio player only played
DVD-A (and regular DVD video and music CDs). The recent smattering
of hybrid machines that play both, for example from Pioneer,
has not really brought peace between rival formats.
Total War
In 2003, we now have a format war between these two new high-resolution music
formats. Which is better, and which will win? At Hi-Fi News, we watch the shifting
balance of power, as first one format announces a new adoption by this manufacturer,
this record label, or that recording studio; and then the other format answers
with its own volley of successes.
The sad truth is that the division serves only to confuse the potential buyer,
often leading to a postponement of any new purchase, ‘until the battle
dies down a bit’. Some hi-fi product manufacturers have grasped the opportunity
to appease early-adopting (although both formats are over four years old now...
) music enthusiasts by making a machine that will play both types of disc,
but these are the exception rather than the rule. One thing that is becoming
clearer, however, is that so long as one of the two formats ultimately gains
the upper hand, then the record industry will have won the war.
Copy-proofing
Both new high-resolution formats were ‘sold’ to the record industry
with two important intentions. The first was to revive an industry complaining
of diminishing sales of its product (the Compact Disc), with something novel.
The music boom of the 1980s was in part due to many people buying their record
collection all over again, on the new digital format; but that novelty has
since disappeared. The film industry, meanwhile, had one of its greatest shots
in the arm in the late 1990s with the introduction of DVD video, a runaway
success story which continues today.
The second motive for a new music format was security. The Compact Disc is
a format that can be easily copied nowadays, to a blank CD-R, or compressed
to MP3, allowing easy distribution over the internet. To succeed in winning
over the record industry, the creators of both DVD-A and SACD had to gain the
trust of the music business by making a disc that could not be copied. And
that is the principal raison d’etre of both these new discs. The digital
outputs once fitted to many CD players will no longer be necessary, as the
music and hardware industries have conspired to make sure that no music will
be available in raw digital form. There is no way to play an SACD disc on a
computer, so the potential for ‘rippping’ here is, at the moment
at least, negligible.
final page>>
|
| |
|